Relying on memory instead of contemporaneous notes may result in which type of bias?

Relying on memory instead of contemporaneous notes can lead to reconstructive effects, which refer to the way memories can be altered or distorted when they are recalled. This phenomenon occurs because individuals may not remember events exactly as they happened; instead, they might fill in gaps with information or beliefs that align with their current understanding or feelings. Moreover, the process of recalling an event can actively change a person's memory of it, leading to the potential for inaccuracies and biases in what is remembered.

Contemporaneous notes serve as an objective account of events, preserving the details as they were at the time of occurrence. When one depends solely on their recollection, they risk creating a version of events that may be influenced by their current mindset or emotions, thereby introducing error into their memory. This is particularly relevant in ethical considerations, where accuracy and reliability of information are crucial. Thus, the reliance on memory without supporting documentation can compromise the integrity of the recollections, making reconstructive effects a primary concern.