What can serve as examples of impeachment evidence?

Impeachment evidence is used to challenge the credibility of a witness, and various factors can contribute to this purpose. A witness's criminal history or bad acts can demonstrate potential biases or motives that may affect their reliability, making it pertinent for assessing a witness's credibility. Inconsistencies in trial testimony are critical because they can point to a lack of reliability in the witness's account. If a witness has made contradictory statements, it raises doubts about their truthfulness and the overall integrity of their testimony.

Additionally, deals with the state in exchange for testimony can also serve as impeachment evidence. If a witness has received some form of inducement or deal, it may suggest that their testimony is motivated by self-interest rather than truth, further undermining their credibility.

Since all of these factors—criminal history, inconsistencies in testimony, and deals with the state—play a significant role in calling into question a witness’s reliability, all of them collectively serve as valid examples of impeachment evidence. This comprehensive understanding of various forms of impeachment evidence highlights their importance in legal proceedings.