What ongoing obligation does the prosecution have under the Michael Morton Act?

The ongoing obligation of the prosecution under the Michael Morton Act is that they must continue their duty even after the trial. This Act emphasizes the importance of transparency and fairness in the prosecution process, mandating that the prosecution disclose exculpatory evidence and information that could affect the outcome of the case beyond just the immediate trial phase.

This ongoing obligation ensures that justice is served holistically and allows for the possibility of new evidence emerging or new issues arising that could impact the validity of the trial's outcome. It holds the prosecution accountable for their role in upholding the integrity of the legal process even after a verdict has been rendered, thereby protecting the rights of the accused and ensuring that wrongful convictions can be addressed in a timely manner.

The other options do not capture the scope of the prosecution's responsibilities as defined by the Michael Morton Act. For instance, delivering evidence solely during the trial limits the prosecution's duty to a narrow timeframe, failing to recognize ongoing responsibilities. Similarly, completing investigations only post-trial or limiting the handling of appeals to within one year do not align with the overarching intent of the Act to ensure continuous oversight and accountability within the justice system.