What type of evidence is a corrected report considered when a drug examiner misplaces a sample?

A corrected report is considered exculpatory evidence because it holds the potential to demonstrate the innocence of a defendant or the lack of guilt in a situation where a drug examiner has misplaced a sample. Exculpatory evidence is any evidence that helps establish a person’s innocence or reduces their culpability in a criminal case.

In this context, if the original report is corrected due to issues stemming from the misplacement of a sample, the implication is that the corrected information could lead to a different outcome regarding the individual's culpability. It provides a clearer picture of the situation, potentially showing that the evidence initially presented was flawed, which is crucial in maintaining fairness within the judicial process.

On the other hand, impeachment evidence typically serves to challenge the credibility of witnesses or evidence and does not inherently establish innocence. Mitigating evidence serves to lessen the severity of a sentence rather than address innocence directly, while inadmissible evidence is that which cannot be considered in court for various legal reasons, thereby not serving its intended purpose in establishing the truth of the matter at hand.