When linear sequential unmasking is used, what is the expected ability of examiners to change their conclusions after exposure to the reference material?

When using linear sequential unmasking, the concept revolves around how exposure to reference materials might influence an examiner's conclusions. The method is designed to minimize bias by providing scaffolded access to information. This means that as examiners progress through the unmasking process, they may be exposed to information gradually, which can indeed lead to a modification of their initial assessments.

Choosing limited ability to change conclusions reflects the understanding that while examiners can adjust their perspectives as they confront evidence, significant shifts are not always anticipated. The structure of linear sequential unmasking means that initial impressions may be reinforced by subsequent information rather than completely overturned. Examiners might revise conclusions to some extent when confronted with new information, but there is an expectation that the foundational judgments they held prior to unmasking will still play a considerable role in their final conclusions.

This aligns with the principles of forensic analysis where consistent methodologies help maintain a controlled environment for evaluation, yet the rigid framework implies that while change is possible, it is not limitless or even moderate; it is constrained as examiners work within the guidelines established by the methodology. Hence, the idea that examiners have limited ability to change their conclusions after exposure to the reference material adheres closely to the nature of the linear sequential